Article "Фёдар Мацвеевіч Іванчанка" in Belarusian Wikipedia has 32.2 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 13 references and 7 sections.
Since the creation of article "Фёдар Мацвеевіч Іванчанка", its content was written by 3 registered users of Belarusian Wikipedia and edited by 3 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 12 times in Belarusian Wikipedia and cited 12 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Belarusian: #6496 06.2020 |
Global: #8237936 02.2021 |
On 8 July 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Diogo Jota, João Pedro, Ozzy Osbourne, Laura Siegemund, Aryna Sabalenka, Julian McMahon, Jurassic World Rebirth, 2025 FIFA Club World Cup, Amanda Anisimova, F1.
In Belarusian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Юрый Анатольевіч Рыдкін, Вера Аляксандраўна Палякова-Макей, Пётр Пятровіч Шарыпа, Анастасія Раманаўна Лаўрынчук, Беларусь, Купалле, Вікіпедыя, Спіс беларускіх імён, Рэўтт Іван Міхайлавіч (01.02.1848–1893~), Аляксей Віктаравіч Мартынюк.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(5.82+6.16+21.05+28+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
