Article "Centro Galego de Londres" in Galician Wikipedia has 3 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 0 references and 3 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "Centro Galego de Londres", its content was written by 6 registered users of Galician Wikipedia and edited by 6 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 3 times in Galician Wikipedia and cited 3 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Galician: #16689 02.2019 |
Global: #6735848 12.2011 |
On 16 June 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Iran, 2025 FIFA Club World Cup, Israel, Ali Khamenei, FIFA Club World Cup, Benjamin Netanyahu, Ruhollah Khomeini, Iran–Israel proxy conflict, G7, Mohammad Reza I of Iran.
In Galician Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Gerardo Pardo de Vera, Afra Torrado, Alfonso Villares Bermúdez, Vicente Vázquez Vidal, Guitarricadelafuente, Amador Arias, Áreas lingüísticas do galego, Emilio Pérez Nieto, AC-230, Pyrrharctia isabella.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(0.98+0+0+15+0)-0.16$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
