Article "Unità previsionali di base" in Italian Wikipedia has 0.3 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "Unità previsionali di base", its content was written by 10 registered users of Italian Wikipedia and edited by 10 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 2 times in Italian Wikipedia and cited 2 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Italian: #48045 06.2009 |
Global: #800431 06.2009 |
| Best Rank | Italian: #16665 01.2006 |
Global: #453812 01.2006 |
On 8 July 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Diogo Jota, João Pedro, Ozzy Osbourne, Laura Siegemund, Aryna Sabalenka, Julian McMahon, Jurassic World Rebirth, 2025 FIFA Club World Cup, Amanda Anisimova, F1.
In Italian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: João Pedro (calciatore 2001), Tragedia della discoteca Lanterna Azzurra, Enzo Maresca, Vasco Modena Park 01-07-2017, Grigor Dimitrov, João Pedro, Flavio Cobolli, Thiago Silva, Ema Stokholma, Aryna Sabalenka.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(1.67+0+0+0+0)-0.02$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
