자바와 C++의 비교

Quality:

Comparison of Java and C++ - comparison between two coding languages. Article "자바와 C++의 비교" in Korean Wikipedia has 21 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 6 references and 11 sections.

This article has the best quality in Chinese Wikipedia. However, the most popular language version of this article is English.

Since the creation of article "자바와 C++의 비교", its content was written by 21 registered users of Korean Wikipedia and edited by 424 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 26 times in Korean Wikipedia and cited 134 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

• Local (Korean): #1101 in September 2008
• Global: #474 in March 2002

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

• Local (Korean): #6646 in April 2008
• Global: #34248 in February 2013

There are 6 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

#	Language	Quality grade	Quality score
1	Chinese (zh) Java和C++的對照		46.9873
2	English (en) Comparison of Java and C++		41.9832
3	Korean (ko) 자바와 C++의 비교		20.9849
4	Japanese (ja) JavaとC++の比較		18.5823
5	Norwegian (no) Forskjeller mellom C++ og Java		15.4801
6	Finnish (fi) Java- ja C++-ohjelmointikielten vertailu		8.4697

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) Comparison of Java and C++		2 762 384
2	Japanese (ja) JavaとC++の比較		270 558
3	Chinese (zh) Java和C++的對照		235 081
4	Korean (ko) 자바와 C++의 비교		96 167
5	Norwegian (no) Forskjeller mellom C++ og Java		9 764
6	Finnish (fi) Java- ja C++-ohjelmointikielten vertailu		251

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) Comparison of Java and C++		981
2	Chinese (zh) Java和C++的對照		410
3	Japanese (ja) JavaとC++の比較		226
4	Korean (ko) 자바와 C++의 비교		95
5	Norwegian (no) Forskjeller mellom C++ og Java		9
6	Finnish (fi) Java- ja C++-ohjelmointikielten vertailu		5

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	English (en) Comparison of Java and C++		320
2	Japanese (ja) JavaとC++の比較		30
3	Chinese (zh) Java和C++的對照		28
4	Korean (ko) 자바와 C++의 비교		21
5	Norwegian (no) Forskjeller mellom C++ og Java		19
6	Finnish (fi) Java- ja C++-ohjelmointikielten vertailu		6

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	English (en) Comparison of Java and C++		0
2	Finnish (fi) Java- ja C++-ohjelmointikielten vertailu		0
3	Japanese (ja) JavaとC++の比較		0
4	Korean (ko) 자바와 C++의 비교		0
5	Norwegian (no) Forskjeller mellom C++ og Java		0
6	Chinese (zh) Java和C++的對照		0

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

On 8 July 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Diogo Jota, João Pedro, Ozzy Osbourne, Laura Siegemund, Aryna Sabalenka, Julian McMahon, Jurassic World Rebirth, 2025 FIFA Club World Cup, Amanda Anisimova, F1.

In Korean Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 문화방송, 한국방송공사, 한국교육방송공사, 기후변화, 케이팝 데몬 헌터스, 타히티섬, 강호순, 문원 (가수), 이진숙 (언론인), 최지우.

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information