Article "時代少年團影視及音樂作品列表" in Chinese Wikipedia has 39.1 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 10 references and 31 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
In June 2025 the article "時代少年團影視及音樂作品列表" was edited by 2 authors in Chinese Wikipedia and written by 2 authors in all languages.
Since the creation of article "時代少年團影視及音樂作品列表", its content was written by 25 registered users of Chinese Wikipedia and edited by 25 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 5 times in Chinese Wikipedia and cited 5 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Chinese: #4481 08.2024 |
Global: #203773 08.2024 |
On 9 July 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: João Pedro Junqueira de Jesus, Belinda Bencic, 2025 FIFA Club World Cup, Flavio Cobolli, Ozzy Osbourne, Superman, Mirra Andreeva, Diogo Jota, Novak Djokovic, Christian Horner.
In Chinese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 鐵冬青, 權恩妃, 书卷一梦, 庭瑄, Kpop 獵魔女團, 桃花映江山, F1電影, 中華民國刑法第一百條, 翡翠谷 (電影), 牽牛和仙女.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(83.73+9.9+0+100+12.1)-2.06$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
