Lin Wei-chou - Taiwanese politician. Article "林為洲" in Chinese Wikipedia has 39.8 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 18 references and 14 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
In July 2024 the article "林為洲" was edited by 1 authors in Chinese Wikipedia and written by 1 authors in all languages.
Since the creation of article "林為洲", its content was written by 102 registered users of Chinese Wikipedia (8353rd place) and edited by 102 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 423 times in Chinese Wikipedia and cited 423 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Chinese: #916 06.2018 |
Global: #73184 06.2018 |
On 8 July 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Diogo Jota, João Pedro, Ozzy Osbourne, Laura Siegemund, Aryna Sabalenka, Julian McMahon, Jurassic World Rebirth, 2025 FIFA Club World Cup, Amanda Anisimova, F1.
In Chinese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 權恩妃, 林沖 (藝人), 书卷一梦, K-Pop：惡魔獵人, 桃花映江山, F1電影, 瑞草洞 (電視劇), 黃敏惠, 我們與惡的距離 II, 周先旺.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(43.52+18.18+16.67+100+42.48)-4.42$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
