Argumentul designului defectuos

ro

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6

Argumentul designului defectuos

Quality:

Argument from poor design - errors in organic building mechanisms in life forms contradicts the smart design theory. Article "Argumentul designului defectuos" in Romanian Wikipedia has 39.5 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 40 references and 12 sections.

This article has the best quality in English Wikipedia. Also, this article is the most popular in that language version.

In July 2024 the article "Argumentul designului defectuos" was edited by 1 authors in Romanian Wikipedia and written by 3 authors in all languages.

Since the creation of article "Argumentul designului defectuos", its content was written by 1 registered users of Romanian Wikipedia and edited by 429 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 10 times in Romanian Wikipedia and cited 1200 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (Romanian): #22427 in July 2024
  • Global: #8947 in June 2006

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (Romanian): #57395 in July 2024
  • Global: #166618 in July 2011

There are 13 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1English (en)
Argument from poor design
50.4945
2Hebrew (he)
טיעון התכנון הלקוי
42.7805
3Serbo-Croatian (sh)
Argument lošeg stvaranja
42.7453
4Romanian (ro)
Argumentul designului defectuos
39.5016
5Croatian (hr)
Argument oskudna dizajna
29.8666
6French (fr)
Argument de la mauvaise conception
28.2178
7Serbian (sr)
Аргумент лошег стварања
27.0237
8Arabic (ar)
حجة ضعف التصميم
26.1751
9Persian (fa)
برهان طراحی ضعیف
13.7157
10Spanish (es)
Argumento del mal diseño
9.4066
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Argumentul designului defectuos" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Argument from poor design
689 609
2German (de)
Unintelligent Design
118 237
3Persian (fa)
برهان طراحی ضعیف
50 253
4Dutch (nl)
Unintelligent Design
36 817
5Spanish (es)
Argumento del mal diseño
36 119
6Arabic (ar)
حجة ضعف التصميم
14 265
7Croatian (hr)
Argument oskudna dizajna
2 370
8Serbian (sr)
Аргумент лошег стварања
1 988
9Hebrew (he)
טיעון התכנון הלקוי
1 695
10Basque (eu)
Diseinu kaskarraren argudioa
1 266
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in July 2024

The most popular language versions of the article "Argumentul designului defectuos" in July 2024
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Argument from poor design
1 036
2Persian (fa)
برهان طراحی ضعیف
232
3Spanish (es)
Argumento del mal diseño
113
4German (de)
Unintelligent Design
96
5Arabic (ar)
حجة ضعف التصميم
95
6Romanian (ro)
Argumentul designului defectuos
67
7Dutch (nl)
Unintelligent Design
47
8French (fr)
Argument de la mauvaise conception
30
9Hebrew (he)
טיעון התכנון הלקוי
19
10Croatian (hr)
Argument oskudna dizajna
12
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Argumentul designului defectuos" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Argument from poor design
288
2German (de)
Unintelligent Design
55
3Dutch (nl)
Unintelligent Design
18
4Persian (fa)
برهان طراحی ضعیف
14
5Arabic (ar)
حجة ضعف التصميم
13
6Spanish (es)
Argumento del mal diseño
13
7Serbian (sr)
Аргумент лошег стварања
10
8Hebrew (he)
טיעון התכנון הלקוי
9
9Basque (eu)
Diseinu kaskarraren argudioa
3
10French (fr)
Argument de la mauvaise conception
3
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in July 2024

Language versions of the article "Argumentul designului defectuos" with the highest AI in July 2024
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Argument from poor design
1
2French (fr)
Argument de la mauvaise conception
1
3Romanian (ro)
Argumentul designului defectuos
1
4Arabic (ar)
حجة ضعف التصميم
0
5German (de)
Unintelligent Design
0
6Spanish (es)
Argumento del mal diseño
0
7Basque (eu)
Diseinu kaskarraren argudioa
0
8Persian (fa)
برهان طراحی ضعیف
0
9Hebrew (he)
טיעון התכנון הלקוי
0
10Croatian (hr)
Argument oskudna dizajna
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Argumentul designului defectuos" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Argument from poor design
547
2Arabic (ar)
حجة ضعف التصميم
290
3Persian (fa)
برهان طراحی ضعیف
248
4Serbian (sr)
Аргумент лошег стварања
29
5Serbo-Croatian (sh)
Argument lošeg stvaranja
24
6Croatian (hr)
Argument oskudna dizajna
21
7Spanish (es)
Argumento del mal diseño
14
8Romanian (ro)
Argumentul designului defectuos
10
9German (de)
Unintelligent Design
6
10Dutch (nl)
Unintelligent Design
5
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
Romanian:
Global:
Popularity in July 2024:
Romanian:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
Romanian:
Global:
Authors in July 2024:
Romanian:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
Romanian:
Global:
Citations:
Romanian:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
arArabic
حجة ضعف التصميم
deGerman
Unintelligent Design
enEnglish
Argument from poor design
esSpanish
Argumento del mal diseño
euBasque
Diseinu kaskarraren argudioa
faPersian
برهان طراحی ضعیف
frFrench
Argument de la mauvaise conception
heHebrew
טיעון התכנון הלקוי
hrCroatian
Argument oskudna dizajna
nlDutch
Unintelligent Design
roRomanian
Argumentul designului defectuos
shSerbo-Croatian
Argument lošeg stvaranja
srSerbian
Аргумент лошег стварања

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank Romanian:
#57395
07.2024
Global:
#166618
07.2011

AI rank trends

Best Rank Romanian:
#22427
07.2024
Global:
#8947
06.2006

Global AI rank history

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Argument from poor design from Wikipedia articles about Intelligent design, Existence of God, Evolution, List of religions and spiritual traditions and Erotic lactation. Whereas reading the article about Argument from poor design people most often go to Wikipedia articles on Dysteleology, Ectopic pregnancy, Plantaris muscle, Reductio ad absurdum and Albatross.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 8 July 2025

On 8 July 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Diogo Jota, João Pedro, Ozzy Osbourne, Laura Siegemund, Aryna Sabalenka, Julian McMahon, Jurassic World Rebirth, 2025 FIFA Club World Cup, Amanda Anisimova, F1.

In Romanian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Laura Siegemund, Alexandru Rogobete, Beach, Please! Festival, Ilie Bolojan, Diogo Jota, România, Superbet, Arina Sabalenka, Campionatul Mondial al Cluburilor FIFA 2025, Gheorghe Piperea.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information