C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较

zh

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6

C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较

Quality:

Comparison of C# and Visual Basic .NET - C# and Visual Basic .NET are the two primary languages used to program on the .NET Framework. Article "C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较" in Chinese Wikipedia has 25.6 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 13 references and 5 sections.

This article has the best quality in English Wikipedia. Also, this article is the most popular in that language version.

Since the creation of article "C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较", its content was written by 11 registered users of Chinese Wikipedia and edited by 224 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 62 times in Chinese Wikipedia and cited 210 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (Chinese): #7270 in May 2014
  • Global: #57963 in June 2006

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (Chinese): #79953 in November 2015
  • Global: #146966 in February 2008

There are 5 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1English (en)
Comparison of C Sharp and Visual Basic .NET
41.0636
2Chinese (zh)
C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较
25.5585
3Persian (fa)
مقایسه سی‌شارپ و ویژوال بیسیک دات‌نت
16.9308
4Korean (ko)
비주얼 베이직 닷넷과 C 샤프의 비교
14.8786
5Turkish (tr)
C Sharp ve Visual Basic .NET karşılaştırması
4.5608
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Comparison of C Sharp and Visual Basic .NET
1 238 952
2Chinese (zh)
C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较
43 632
3Persian (fa)
مقایسه سی‌شارپ و ویژوال بیسیک دات‌نت
27 692
4Korean (ko)
비주얼 베이직 닷넷과 C 샤프의 비교
27 600
5Turkish (tr)
C Sharp ve Visual Basic .NET karşılaştırması
211
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Comparison of C Sharp and Visual Basic .NET
1 593
2Chinese (zh)
C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较
113
3Korean (ko)
비주얼 베이직 닷넷과 C 샤프의 비교
15
4Persian (fa)
مقایسه سی‌شارپ و ویژوال بیسیک دات‌نت
9
5Turkish (tr)
C Sharp ve Visual Basic .NET karşılaştırması
7
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Comparison of C Sharp and Visual Basic .NET
192
2Persian (fa)
مقایسه سی‌شارپ و ویژوال بیسیک دات‌نت
11
3Chinese (zh)
C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较
11
4Korean (ko)
비주얼 베이직 닷넷과 C 샤프의 비교
6
5Turkish (tr)
C Sharp ve Visual Basic .NET karşılaştırması
4
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Comparison of C Sharp and Visual Basic .NET
1
2Persian (fa)
مقایسه سی‌شارپ و ویژوال بیسیک دات‌نت
0
3Korean (ko)
비주얼 베이직 닷넷과 C 샤프의 비교
0
4Turkish (tr)
C Sharp ve Visual Basic .NET karşılaştırması
0
5Chinese (zh)
C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Comparison of C Sharp and Visual Basic .NET
70
2Chinese (zh)
C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较
62
3Korean (ko)
비주얼 베이직 닷넷과 C 샤프의 비교
55
4Persian (fa)
مقایسه سی‌شارپ و ویژوال بیسیک دات‌نت
23
5Turkish (tr)
C Sharp ve Visual Basic .NET karşılaştırması
0
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
Chinese:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
Chinese:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
Chinese:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
Chinese:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
Chinese:
Global:
Citations:
Chinese:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
enEnglish
Comparison of C Sharp and Visual Basic .NET
faPersian
مقایسه سی‌شارپ و ویژوال بیسیک دات‌نت
koKorean
비주얼 베이직 닷넷과 C 샤프의 비교
trTurkish
C Sharp ve Visual Basic .NET karşılaştırması
zhChinese
C#与Visual Basic .NET的比较

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank Chinese:
#79953
11.2015
Global:
#146966
02.2008

AI rank trends

Best Rank Chinese:
#7270
05.2014
Global:
#57963
06.2006

Local AI rank history

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 12 August 2025

On 12 August 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Cristiano Ronaldo, Wednesday, Georgina Rodríguez, ChatGPT, Weapons, Jenna Ortega, deaths in 2025, Taylor Swift, Miguel Uribe Turbay, 2025–26 UEFA Champions League.

In Chinese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 朱由𣜬, 林岱樺, 林逸欣, 江油未成年人欺凌事件, 鬼滅之刃, 黃士修, 鬼滅之刃角色列表, 锦月如歌, 2025年亞洲盃籃球賽, 鬼滅之刃劇場版 無限城篇.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information